Dried blood microsampling,
no cold chain.
Capillary blood that dries on a tip or a card and ships at ambient temperature (no cold chain, no ice, no excursion risk). There are three dried formats: VAMS, the dried blood spot, and quantitative DBS. We built the platform on the most accurate of them, VAMS.
We chose VAMS.
Every dried-blood format has to answer one question: how much blood is actually in the sample the laboratory analyses. A classic spot leaves it uncontrolled; VAMS fixes it at source. Volumetric absorptive microsampling wicks a fixed, known volume of capillary blood onto an absorbent tip (a set 10&ndash);30 µL regardless of how the blood would spread, and largely independent of haematocrit. The whole tip is then analysed, so there is no sub-sampling and no spot-area bias. That is precisely what quantitation needs, which is why VAMS is our default dried-blood solution on the platform.
Introduced by Denniff and Spooner in 2014, VAMS is now one of the most actively validated microsampling techniques in bioanalysis, with a decade of peer-reviewed method and clinical validation behind it. The evidence is aggregated below →
Volumetric, by Neoteryx.
VAMS is delivered by the Neoteryx Mitra device: an absorbent polymer tip that fills from a fingertip drop in seconds, dries on its station, and ships at ambient temperature. The laboratory elutes the whole tip and runs the validated assay. Humans Nexus curates and supplies the device on the platform and assembles the regulated kit around it; Neoteryx is the manufacturer.
Three ways to dry a sample.
All three dry the blood and ship it ambient. They differ in one thing (whether the volume analysed is controlled) and that difference decides which analytes each can quantify.
| VAMS | Dried blood spot | Quantitative DBS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Principle | Absorbent tip wicks a set volume | Free drops onto a card | Metered volume onto a card |
| Volume control | Fixed at the tip | Uncontrolled, sub-punch of a free spot | Fixed by microfluidic metering |
| Haematocrit–area bias | Removed by design | Present on classic cards | Removed at source |
| Analysed portion | The whole tip | A punched sub-disc | The whole metered disc |
| Best-established use | Quantitative TDM, LC-MS/MS | Newborn & population screening, serology | Quantitative work on a card |
| Ambient shipping | Yes, no cold chain | Yes, no cold chain | Yes, no cold chain |
VAMS, the volumetric tip
The tip absorbs a fixed volume and is analysed whole, so the area-bias and homogeneity problems of a spot are removed by design. An honest nuance for method developers: removing the volumetric bias does not make every assay perfectly haematocrit-independent (a residual, haematocrit-dependent)recovery effect can persist for some analytes, so each assay is still validated per analyte rather than assumed. It is the format built for quantitation.
Dried blood spot, the proven classic
The dried blood spot is the original micro-volume format, and its pedigree is more than six decades deep: population newborn screening (tens of millions of infants a year) runs on it, and because immunoglobulins are stable when dried and serology reads a ratio rather than an absolute volume, DBS underpins large-scale antibody surveillance too. Its strengths are real. Its limitation is specific and narrow: getting an accurate concentration from a fixed sub-punch of a spot formed from an unknown volume, where the haematocrit effect, sub-punch variability and non-uniform analyte spreading all bear on the result. The card is excellent; the uncontrolled volume is the caveat.
Quantitative DBS (the spot, upgraded)
Quantitative DBS keeps everything patients and labs like about the card (finger-prick, dried paper, ambient post) and fixes the one weakness: it meters a precise, known volume onto the card and analyses the whole disc, so there is no sub-punch and no haematocrit-driven area bias. It is best understood not as a different sample type but as the dried blood spot done quantitatively: the classic card, with the volume brought under control.
Which format, when.
Quantitation where a fixed, known volume decides the result (therapeutic drug monitoring, LC-MS/MS small molecules, quantitative biomarkers). Our default.
Ratio and threshold assays and validated screening at scale (newborn and population programmes, serosurveillance) where the classic card is proven and economical.
The card format kept, with volumetric metering added, for quantitative work that still wants a paper disc rather than a tip.
Whichever format fits, suitability is established per analyte through method validation before any patient-facing result (the format is chosen for the assay, not the other way round).
Validated before it reports.
Because dried formats can carry haematocrit and recovery considerations, every panel is validated per analyte along a research-to-clinical transfer pathway into ISO 15189-accredited laboratories, both analytical validation and clinical validation against a venous reference. Where a plasma-equivalent result is reported from capillary blood, an established, analyte-specific capillary-to-plasma relationship is applied, following international therapeutic-drug-monitoring guidance. VAMS (Neoteryx Mitra) is a CE-marked component within those validated kits.
The reference frameworks a laboratory implements against (the IATDMCT guidelines on dried-blood method validation and on capillary-to-plasma conversion) are listed in the reading below.
The research library.
No papers match these filters.
External links open an open-access full text where one exists, otherwise the publisher or PubMed record. These citations describe the published evidence for the collection formats and devices (not claims about specific Humans Nexus assays, which are validated per analyte and per laboratory).
Whoever runs the test.
Infrastructure for healthcare and life sciences. Our partners reach the patient, and we never sell directly.
Good to know.
How is VAMS different from a dried blood spot?
VAMS absorbs a fixed, known volume on a tip and is analysed whole, removing the spot-volume and homogeneity variability that limit quantitation from a classic dried blood spot. Quantitative DBS reaches the same goal on a card by metering a fixed volume onto it. The dried blood spot itself remains excellent for threshold assays such as serology.
Does VAMS remove the haematocrit effect entirely?
It removes the volumetric/area bias by design, but not automatically every haematocrit influence (a residual, analyte-dependent recovery effect can remain). That is why each assay is validated per analyte rather than assumed to be haematocrit-independent.
Is the dried blood spot less accurate?
Not in general. DBS is proven and excellent for ratio and threshold assays (newborn screening and serology run on it) and for many validated drugs. Its limitation is specific: absolute quantitation from a fixed sub-punch of a spot made from an uncontrolled volume. Where that matters, VAMS or quantitative DBS is the better choice.
Do dried formats need a cold chain?
No. Once dry, the VAMS tip and the DBS card are stable at ambient temperature and ship by standard tracked return (no refrigeration, no temperature logging). This is why dried is the default for remote blood collection.
Can a home capillary result substitute for a venous draw?
For well-characterised analytes, yes (clinical-validation studies report good agreement with venous blood, and where a plasma-equivalent result is needed an established capillary-to-plasma relationship is applied). It is established per analyte, following international TDM guidance, before any patient-facing reporting.
Are the devices regulated?
Neoteryx Mitra (VAMS) is a CE-marked component within validated kits, with method validation in ISO 15189-accredited laboratories before patient-facing reporting. Device-level regulatory status is held by the manufacturer; Humans Nexus assembles the regulated kit around it.
Put dried blood on the platform.
Talk to us about adding cold-chain-free dried blood collection to your programme.